Posts Tagged ‘new jersey criminal lawyer’
New Criminal Court Procedure if You are Arrested in New Jersey After May 20, 2016
New criminal court procedure if you are arrested after May 20, 2016: There are substantial changes to the New Jersey criminal court procedure for all indictable offense is an all complaint/summons cases. Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. This blog we will discuss the changes and procedure for indictable offense is that becomes…
Read MoreExpert Testimony of Police for Drug Cases
Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. Expert Testimony on Drug Possession versus Possession with Distribution In this case, State of New Jersey vs Jamison, the County Prosecutor identified one of their own investigator’s to be an ‘expert’ to testify what amount of drug possession equals possession with distribution, as opposed to just ‘possession’. This can have a…
Read MoreN.J. law requiring police-car cameras ruled unconstitutional
Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. TRENTON – A 2014 law requiring all New Jersey municipalities to outfit new police patrol cars with dashboard cameras is unconstitutional because it does not provide an adequate funding source, a state board ruled Wednesday. The ruling by the Council on Local Mandates on a challenge brought…
Read MoreState vs. Rosario: Is this an arrest or a field inquiry?
Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark State vs. Rosario In this case the issue is whether the police’s contact and communications with the defendant was a ‘field inquiry’, a Terry stop, or a custodial interrogation? If difference depends on whether the subject of the inquiry, the defendant here, feels their freedom to leave have been…
Read MoreLegal Standard of Review of a Trial Court’s Motion to Suppress | State vs. Wilson
Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark 14-2-9404 State v. Winslow, App. Div. (per curiam) (13 pp.) When reviewing a motion to suppress, we “must uphold the factual findings underlying the trial court’s decision so long as those findings are supported by sufficient credible evidence in the record.” Handy, supra, 206 N.J. at 44 (citation…
Read MoreRight to Privacy in the Hotel Registration Sign In / Log book
Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. 14-2-9404 State v. Winslow, App. Div. (per curiam) (13 pp.) A long standing standard ‘slow night’ policing tactic includes an officer conducted a “registry check” at the neighborhood low end ‘motels’ or hotels in town looking for anyone with an outstanding warrant for arrest for any reason. In this…
Read MoreCriminal Resources related to State vs. Feliciano
Published by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark 2A:156A-8. Authorization for application for order to intercept communications The Attorney General, county prosecutor or a person designated to act for such an official and to perform his duties in and during his actual absence or disability, may authorize, in writing, an ex parte application to a…
Read MoreState vs Wright: Intimidation and Psychological Tools Used by Police Prior to Miranda Warnings
Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Attorney, Jeffrey Hark State vs. Wright Appellate Division February 29, 2016 (Approved for Publication) The key to this part of the decision is the appellate courts recognition of the psychological warfare tools used by the police to intimidate and cajole arrestees into admitting anything, anything between the time they are…
Read MoreState vs. Wright: Identification of the defendant by the victim at the scene
Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Attorney, Jeffrey Hark State vs. Wright Appellate Division February 29, 2016 (Approved for Publication) The next issue in this case is the identification of the defendant by the victim at the scene. In 2011 the NJ Supreme Court handed down it surfing in State vs. Henderson. That decision outlined a…
Read MoreAppellate Review of Defendant’s Statement Without the Benefit of Miranda Warnings.
Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. State vs. Wright 1) Appellate review of a trial court’s decision for out of court identification and a use of defendant’s statement without the benefit of miranda warnings. This court, as all, review facts and the law and the trial court’s written decision. The court then outlines…
Read More