New Jersey Criminal Law
Legal Standard of Review of a Trial Court’s Motion to Suppress | State vs. Wilson
Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark 14-2-9404 State v. Winslow, App. Div. (per curiam) (13 pp.) When reviewing a motion to suppress, we “must uphold the factual findings underlying the trial court’s decision so long as those findings are supported by sufficient credible evidence in the record.” Handy, supra, 206 N.J. at 44 (citation…
Read MoreRight to Privacy in the Hotel Registration Sign In / Log book
Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. 14-2-9404 State v. Winslow, App. Div. (per curiam) (13 pp.) A long standing standard ‘slow night’ policing tactic includes an officer conducted a “registry check” at the neighborhood low end ‘motels’ or hotels in town looking for anyone with an outstanding warrant for arrest for any reason. In this…
Read MoreCriminal Resources related to State vs. Feliciano
Published by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark 2A:156A-8. Authorization for application for order to intercept communications The Attorney General, county prosecutor or a person designated to act for such an official and to perform his duties in and during his actual absence or disability, may authorize, in writing, an ex parte application to a…
Read MoreState vs Wright: Intimidation and Psychological Tools Used by Police Prior to Miranda Warnings
Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Attorney, Jeffrey Hark State vs. Wright Appellate Division February 29, 2016 (Approved for Publication) The key to this part of the decision is the appellate courts recognition of the psychological warfare tools used by the police to intimidate and cajole arrestees into admitting anything, anything between the time they are…
Read MoreState vs. Wright: Identification of the defendant by the victim at the scene
Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Attorney, Jeffrey Hark State vs. Wright Appellate Division February 29, 2016 (Approved for Publication) The next issue in this case is the identification of the defendant by the victim at the scene. In 2011 the NJ Supreme Court handed down it surfing in State vs. Henderson. That decision outlined a…
Read MoreAppellate Review of Defendant’s Statement Without the Benefit of Miranda Warnings.
Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. State vs. Wright 1) Appellate review of a trial court’s decision for out of court identification and a use of defendant’s statement without the benefit of miranda warnings. This court, as all, review facts and the law and the trial court’s written decision. The court then outlines…
Read MoreNew Jersey RULE 3:28. Pretrial Intervention Programs
Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark State vs. A.S. Here is a brief review of the PTI standard and law governing the Prosecutor’s PTI program in New Jersey New Jersey’s PTI program is governed by N.J.S.A. 2C:43-12 and the Supreme Court’s guidelines for implementation, set forth in Rule 3:28. Generally, individuals with no…
Read MoreDischarge from PTI (New Jersey’s Pre-Trial Intervention Program)
State v. A.S., App. Div. (Approved for Publication February 26, 2016) Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark In this case the defendant was initially accepted into New Jersey’s Pre-Trial Intervention Program; a first offenders rehabilitation program/probation program accessible to those who have no prior criminal record and are charged with 3rd or 4th degree non…
Read MoreKey Issues Involving the Interaction Between the Police and Individuals in Their ‘Residences’ | State vs. Webb
State vs. Webb Appellate Division February 12, 2016 Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. Issue 1—– In New Jersey, absent probable cause and exigent circumstances the police still need a search warrant to enter a structure which the defendant may have actual or constructive possession thereof. THIS IS AN INVOLVED AND LONG…
Read MoreAppellate Division Standard of Review of a Trial Court’s Decision
State vs. Webb Appellate Division February 12, 2016 Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Defense Attorney, Jeffrey Hark. IN this blog we review, again, the Appellate Division’s scope and Standard of Review of a trial court’s decision. These are bedrock fundamental concepts that need to be taken into consideration when you are actually at trial listening…
Read More