Don v. Edison Car Company, New Jersey Appellate Division May 9, 2019 (Not Approved for Publication) Submitted by New Jersey Civil Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. Burden of Proof— We also review a trial court’s evidentiary rulings under a deferential standard. “When a trial court admits or excludes evidence, its determination is ‘entitled to deference absent a…
Don v. Edison Car Company, New Jersey Appellate Division May 9, 2019 (Not Approved for Publication) Submitted by New Jersey Civil Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. In this case the plaintiff’s attorney asked the court to give the following ‘time unit measurement jury charge based on past and future pain and suffering— (i) LIFE EXPECTANCY (Approved 02/1996)…
Allowing the jury to hear a Hearsay statement.– How…. “to show a statement’s effect on the listener”
Don v. Edison Car Company, New Jersey Appellate Division May 9, 2019 (Not Approved for Publication) Submitted by New Jersey Civil Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. We first turn to defendant’s contention that the trial court erred when it allowed plaintiff to testify that Dr.’s Vingan and Arginteanu had recommended that plaintiff undergo surgery. It is well established…
State v. Nelson, New Jersey Supreme Court Decided May 8, 2019 — Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. We therefore consider whether a reasonable and articulable suspicion beyond that which justified the stop supported the canine sniff. See Dunbar, 229 N.J. at 540 (“[I]f an officer has articulable reasonable suspicion independent from the reason…
State v. Nelson, New Jersey Supreme Court Decided May 8, 2019 Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. Commentary: The court rules that a 40 minute wait for a drug sniffing dog to arrive based on relatively flimsy ‘independent reasonable and articulable suspicion” of the detective who conducted a motor vehicle stop was not…
State v. Roach New Jersey Appellate Division May 8, 2019 (Not Approved for Publication) Submitted by New Jersey Sex Crime Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. Summary: All 50 states and the federal government have laws that have been held to be constitutionally acceptable allowing law enforcement to take a DNA sample (modern fingerprint) from a defendant at…
Am I limited to making a workers compensation claim, or can I sue in Superior Court? What is the evidentiary requirement of Workers’ Compensation Act? Submitted by New Jersey Workers Compensation Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. Spatola v. Seabrook Bothers & Sons, Inc. Decided New Jersey Appellate Division May 7, 2019 (Not Approved for Publication) Summary: In…
There must be specific and articulable facts that, at the time of the search of a vehicle, a person is capable of gaining immediate control of a weapon or weapons Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. State v. Ortiz New Jersey Appellate Division May 6, 2019 (Not Approved for Publication) Facts: The salient…
State v. Ortiz New Jersey Appellate Division May 6, 2019 (Not Approved for Publication) Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. In reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, this court must defer to the trial court’s fact findings underlying its decision, “so long as those findings are supported by sufficient credible evidence in the…