Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark On June 25, 2014 this blog discussed the Yarbough criteria for sentencing as set forth in State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627 (1985). In short these included: No free crimes (defendant must be sentenced for each crime they are found guilty of committing). Reason for consecutive v.…
Submitted by New Jersey DWI Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark Contrary to popular belief in order to prove intoxication for a DWI charge the State does not need a blood alcohol test nor a field sobriety test but only must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was intoxicated given the totality of the circumstances. The…
Constitutionality of law prohibiting possession of false government documents including digital images is affirmed Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark This blog discusses State v. Borjas, decided by the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, on July 8, 2014. Borjas, the defendant-appellant had his home computers confiscated under a search warrant based…
What constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel? Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark This blog considers State v. Palacios, decided July 3, 2014 by the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division and addresses the question of how other evidence is used to fill in the blanks when a defendant claims memory loss of…
In the recent case of Neglia v. Craft Carpentry and Drywall the Appellate Division court was asked to reconsider a case in two situations (a) was the trial court’s decision based on an incorrect or irrational basis, and (b) the court failed to consider some very relevant or probative evidence. The case involves a petitioner…
On May 29, 2014, the New Jersey Legislature enacted Jessica Lunsford Law. This Law requires any person charged with aggravated sexual assault involving a child under the age of 13 and any type of “penetration” to serve a mandatory minimum and a parole ineligibility of 25 years if they go to Trial and are convicted.…
Major Privacy Ruling – Cell Phones and Unreasonable Search Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. News Flash:—— United States v. Wurie and Riley v. California. The U.S. Supreme Court decided two landmark cases on June 25, 2014 for anyone who gets arrested with a cell phone on them. One case arose out of…
Submitted by New Jersey Sex Crime Attorney, Jeffrey Hark. Purpose: Established a civil procedure for the involuntary commitment of sexually violent predators. Supporting cases: FT-2009 FT-2014 In the event that a sexually violent predator cannot be involuntarily committed due to lack of a “mental illness” they can be committed if person: has been convicted, adjudicated…
Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark This blog will consider State v. M.S. decided on June 17, 2014 by the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. This is a case in which the State of New Jersey appealed an order establishing a Krol term of eleven years for a defendant who was…
Supreme Court Says Phones Can’t Be Searched Without a Warrant Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Attorney, Jeffrey Hark Originally published in the New York Times Read the related SCOTUS case, Riley vs California Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. called cellphones “a pervasive and insistent part of daily life.” Credit Stephen Crowley/The New York Times…